### Sums of periodic functions

#### by David Radcliffe

A real function is said to be **periodic** if there exists a real number so that for all . The number is said to be a **period** of the function. The most familiar examples of periodic functions are the trigonometric functions sine, cosine, and tangent.

Note that if is a period of a function, then are also periods. If a periodic function is continuous and nonconstant, then it has a least period, and all other periods are positive integer multiples of the least period.

There are discontinuous periodic functions that have no least period. The most famous example is the **Dirichlet function**, defined by if is rational, if is irrational. Every positive rational number is a period of the Dirichlet function, so there is no least period.

**Sums of periodic functions are often periodic**

The sum of two periodic functions is often periodic, but not always. Suppose that is periodic with least period , and is periodic with least period . If and have a common multiple , then is periodic with period . However, is not necessarily the *least* period of . To give an extreme example, has no least period.

Some readers may have heard of biorhythm theory, which was popular in the 1970s. The theory claims that humans are influenced by three fundamental cycles: a physical cycle of 23 days, an emotional cycle of 28 days, and an intellectual cycle of 33 days. These cycles are usually modeled as sine waves that start on one’s day of birth. We might suppose that a person’s happiness on day x is the sum of these three cycles.

The figure shows a portion of the graph of this function. It appears to be quite irregular but in fact it repeats every 21,252 days, since 21,252 is the least common multiple of 23, 28, and 33. (View this graph on Desmos.)

**Sums of periodic functions are not always periodic**

If the periods of two periodic functions do not have a common multiple, then their sum is not periodic. Perhaps the simplest example is , whose terms have least periods 2π and 2 respectively.

**Polynomials are finite sums of periodic functions**

Sums of periodic functions can be peculiar indeed. In fact, we can prove the following astonishing theorem:** ***If ** is a polynomial function of a real variable, and the degree of ** is **, then ** is the sum of* * periodic functions.*

It is clear that a non-constant polynomial cannot be expressed as a finite sum of *continuous* periodic functions, since a continuous periodic function is bounded, and a finite sum of bounded functions is bounded. In fact, it can be shown that an unbounded continuous function cannot be expressed as a finite sum of Lebesgue measurable periodic functions. Consequently, we will need to use the Axiom of Choice.

**R as a vector space over Q**

The statement that every vector space has a basis is equivalent to the Axiom of Choice. Since is a vector space over , there is a subset of , called a **Hamel basis**, so that every real number can be written uniquely as a finite linear combination of elements of A with rational coefficients.

For each , we write where is rational and is finite for every .

**Periodicity of (x,a)**

It is readily seen that for all and all . Moreover for distinct . It follows that for all and distinct . In other words, the function is periodic with period for any .

**The identity function is the sum of two periodic functions**

Choose two distinct elements . Then .

Let and .

Then has period *d*, has period *c*, and is the identity function.

**x^2 is the sum of three periodic functions**

Note that . Choose three distinct elements . The term has period , unless or . Since no term involves all three of , it follows that each term has a period of either , , or .

Let be the sum of all terms which have period ; let be the sum of all terms which have period but not ; and let be the sum of all terms which do not have period or . Such terms must have period . More specifically,

Then is a representation of as the sum of three periodic functions.

**A polynomial of degree n is the sum of n+1 periodic functions**

Let *P* be a polynomial of degree *n*. Using the identity we can express *P(x)* as a linear combination of products with . Each term involves at most *n* distinct elements of *A*.

Let be distinct elements of A. No product in the expansion can involve ALL of . Therefore, we can group the terms into sums, , so that no term in involves .

Thus, we have , and each has period . **QED.**

**A polynomial of degree n cannot be written as the sum of n periodic functions**

Suppose that for some *n*, there is a polynomial *P* of degree *n* which is the sum of *n* periodic functions. Let *p* be one of the periods. Then is a polynomial of degree , and it is also the sum of periodic functions, since one of the terms cancels. By repeating this, we eventually obtain a polynomial of degree 1 that is the sum of 1 periodic function. But this is absurd.

**e^x is not the sum of periodic functions**

Suppose that is the sum of *n* periodic functions. Let *p* be one of the periods. Then is the sum of periodic functions, since the term with period *p* cancels out. But is a constant multiple of , so we conclude that is the sum of periodic functions. By repeating this, we find that is the sum of 1 periodic function. But this is absurd.

**Reference**

Stefano Mortola and Roberto Peirone, The Sum of Periodic Functions, Topology Atlas Document # vaaa-21

Thanks for introducing the biorhythms concept.

Thanks for everything _except_ introducing the biorhythms concept. :)

To my question period e and pi of two functions respectively and their summer need noto be a periodic functions

[…] Sums of periodic functions (1290 words). Of all the math articles I’ve read this year, this is the one that surprised me the most. It’s probably not interesting to a general audience, oops. But it has some pretty cool results about periodic functions and their sums. […]

Thanks for everything _including_ the biorhythms concept. :)

Dear author, I’m seeking your permission to translate this article into my native language, Chinese, in a forum. I will translate your materials only if you are willing to grant me the permission.Thanks.

and certainly I will indicate the source.

Yes, you are welcome to translate and repost my article with credit.

[…] Sums of Periodic Capabilities by David Radcliffe […]

[…] Sums of Periodic Capabilities (by David Radcliffe) […]

[…] Sums of Periodic Functions by David Radcliffe […]

[…] Sums of Periodic Ideas by David Radcliffe […]

[…] is based on this blogpost, which I found through this […]